Almost There…

Over the past week, I have continued researching and preparing the website for its release to the public internet. Soon enough, I’ll have the meat of the site: a homepage, one for Greek mythology and another for Norse. Before I go to bed tonight, I’m hoping to finish the Greek page, and who knows, maybe even start the research paper (let’s not get too hopeful now).

The deadline for this project seemed to come out of nowhere, mostly thanks to state and national standardized tests eating up the last week of English class. But that’s alright; I have a whole three day weekend ahead of me, which is an ocean of potential. Finn and I might be a bit behind schedule right now, but there’s nothing that can’t be done with a bit of near-due-date panic!

I’m gonna be honest, at this point in the year, I’m all schooled out. I’ve taken a solid chunk of my finals and have secured solid grades in all of my classes. I’ve been ready to switch into summer mode for more than a week now, and that hasn’t been beneficial to the status of my purpose project. Nevertheless, I’m sure I’ll wrap things up; I always do.

Preparation for Takeoff

Yesterday, me and my friend Finn proposed our project to the class in a format that my teacher calls “The Elevator Pitch”; you have sixty seconds to explain your idea and sell it to “The Boss”.

All in all, our pitch wasn’t bad. I mean, how much can you screw up in sixty seconds anyway, right? We explained our passion for mythology and outlined the design of our website.

Surprisingly, I found that we had some interest. A few people asked questions and gave some helpful feedback, suggesting that we expand to more mythologies from around the world and connect mythology to modern religion. It turns out that everyone is secretly a mythology nerd.

Alright, everything’s in place. Now we just have to do the actual project part…

Humble Beginnings

The end of the school year is near, and my English teacher has assigned one more challenge: a purpose project.

Now, a purpose project is designed to help students find and fulfill their purpose, but most of us, including me, do not have the ability to conjure our purpose out of thin air before the deadline, especially after years of working under a system that attempts to find a purpose for us (#doschooldifferent). Instead of finding my own purpose, I decided to help out my friend Finn with his. In the next few weeks, we aim to design a website that compares and contrasts the major tales of ancient mythologies in order to provide insight on the universal themes behind each one.

I’ll be doing progress updates every week. As of now, we’ve yet to establish a website, but we’ve found most of the sources that we’ll be using for research. There are two big hurdles in the way of my success: my lack of focus in the morning when we’re given time to work, and Finn’s nerdy lectures on Norse mythology. Of course, these obstacles are overcomable, and I’ll have to overcome them at one point or another before the final due date. But that’s about it. Wish me luck!

Third-Eyed Robot, signing off

Growing Into Ourselves, and Into Understanding

While the first half of To Kill A Mockingbird retains a light and sometimes even playful mood, the midpoint flips the story onto a darker path, delving into the faults of humanity that continue to plague society today.


Secret Lives

To Kill a Mockingbird is a story of secrets: the secrets that we hide from others, and the secrets that we hide from ourselves.

Related image

https://tkamchapter16.weebly.com/mr-dolphus-raymond.html

One of the most intriguing secrets revealed to the reader is the lifestyle of Dolphus Raymond. While most townspeople see Dolphus as a drunk who got himself stuck in the black crowd, the reality is quite to the contrary:

“Secretly… I’m not much of a drinker, but you see they could never, never understand that I live like I do because that’s the way I want to live.”

Dolphus is a good-hearted person who doesn’t see reason to treat blacks any worse than whites. He may be good, but that does not make him brave.

Dolphus is an example of someone who isn’t weak enough to give into conformity, yet isn’t strong enough to fight back. Instead, he lives a lie to keep his family safe. And sometimes that’s all a man can afford to do. His secret may not be righteous, but it was made with the right intentions in mind.

Along with secrets exclusive to a few people, Maycomb County also has its fair share of secrets that everyone hides from themselves. These are the hypocrisies that society attempts to avoid in fear of change.

Image result for teacher

https://actions.sumofus.org/a/social-security-for-teachers

One of these lies is perpetuated by Scout’s school teacher, Miss Gates. While in the middle of explaining how America is better than Germany because everyone is “equal,” one of Miss Gates’s students unintentionally points out an obvious flaw in her argument:

“[The Jews are] supposed to change money or somethin’, but that ain’t no cause to persecute ’em. They’re white, ain’t they?”

This inquiry leads Miss Gates to realize that inequality is bad enough in America that it is ingrained in children’s minds, making it comparable to that of Germany. But instead of acting upon her moment of clarity, she takes the path of least resistance by burying this hint of truth with one statement:

“Time for arithmetic, children.”


The Hero of Maycomb County

Throughout the story, the reader meets a broad spectrum of characters, from the kind, innocent Tom Robinson, to the tobacco-chewing, daughter-beating Bob Ewell, to the main character Scout, who finds herself caught up between these extremes. All of these characters reveal their flaws at one point or another – Scout throws the occasional fit, and even Tom gives up all hope and makes a run for it at the labor camp – all, except one: Atticus Finch.

Image result for atticus finch

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atticus_Finch

Atticus is the hero of Maycomb County. He is kind and caring for his children. He is open and honest, being described as “the same in the courtroom as he is on the public streets.” But most importantly, Atticus is brave. He is willing to stand in the face of adversity when others falter. As Miss Maudie says to Jem:

“I simply want to tell you that there are some men in this world who were born to do our unpleasant jobs for us. Your father’s one of them.”

Courage and leadership are the two signs of a hero. Atticus says what others are afraid to say, and this nonconformity is the catalyst for change:

“This case is as simple as black and white.”

This statement is arguably the most clever and impactful thing that Atticus points out in the entire story. On the surface level, he is telling the courtroom that his client is obviously innocent and there is no arguing that. But at the same time, he explains why this whole lawsuit was necessary anyway: Tom Robinson is black, and Mayella Ewell is white. It is, unfortunately, that simple, and Atticus hopes that when people realize this, they will also notice the absurdity in their own social norms. Only a hero could make such a bold statement.

But why is Atticus such a perfect hero? What is the ultimate purpose of his character? It is to show the reader that being heroic is not as easy as it seems, and does not always come with results, as other stories would lead us to believe. Atticus is the man who most people would want to be in such a predicament, but few actually have the willpower that it takes. It is much more likely that any given person living in 1930’s Alabama would question the racial divide as a child, but end up going with the flow by adulthood, because of how hard it is to change people’s minds. Even Atticus sees little fruit from all of his labor, with his biggest victory being the fact that the jury took some time to consider not unanimously voting against Tom.

Luckily, this can be seen from a more positive perspective. Sure, Atticus did not save Tom. And sure, equality is not right around the corner. But that’s not how change works. You can’t just expect a problem to solve itself overnight. These things take time. Racial segregation is a great American evil with deep roots in our history, but great progress has been made and continues to be made each and every day. According to this article from Brookings, in 1998, 86% of whites claimed they had black friends, compared to 18% in 1964, and about a third of the black population was already living in the suburbs.

Anyone can be Atticus, if he/she is willing to accept that progress is a slow march, and it will take the help of many more Attici before the fight is over.

“Atticus Finch won’t win, he can’t win, but he’s the only man in these parts who can keep a jury out so long in a case like that. And I thought to myself, well, we’re making a step – it’s just a baby-step, but it’s a step”

Image result for change

http://www.oclc.org/blog/main/time-to-change-2/

Literature Circle

Instead of the usual Socratic Seminar, my English class discussed our reading in a “lit circle” format, where we were separated into small groups, with each person being assigned a specific job. For both weeks, we had insightful discussions, but the most interesting topic we talked about was the symbolism of the title.

Who is the Mockingbird? My group believes it is Tom Robinson.

Image result for mockingbird

https://www.thespruce.com/northern-mockingbird-profile-387262

Mockingbirds are known for their innocence.

“Mockingbirds don’t do one thing but make music for us to enjoy . . . but sing their hearts out for us. That’s why it’s a sin to kill a mockingbird.”

Robinson is comparable to a mockingbird in this way. Just like a mockingbird, he sang his song for Miss Mayella by doing chores out of the good of his heart. He was innocent, and killing him, just like killing a mockingbird, is a sin.


Conclusion

To Kill a Mockingbird is a classic, timeless tale rich with character. It conveys its themes of truth, lies, and prejudice cleverly with many intricate little details that come together to form a heartfelt read with a poignant message at its core. Although it did not change my life as many others claim it has, this story was nonetheless a quality read that made me think about society in ways I hadn’t beforehand. Everyone should read this book at least once.

4.5/5

Image result for to kill a mockingbird

https://sites.google.com/a/student.bcsdny.org/mrs-lagan-s-english-we/eng-1r/handouts/to-kill-a-mockingbird

 

Family, Friends, and Small Town America

Image result for jem and scout

https://sites.google.com/a/mbusdapps.org/amp6/literary-analysis/mockingbirds–scout-jem

First Impressions

To Kill a Mockingbird is a classic tale that takes place in the fictional Maycomb County, Alabama, during the 1930’s. The opening nine chapters of the book were much more light hearted than I expected going in.

The story is told through the perspective of Jean Louise “Scout” Finch, a small-town girl who loves long summer days and getting tied up in adventures with her older brother, Jem. During the first few chapters, the reader gets a feel for Scout’s world; she leads us through her elementary school troubles, backyard shenanigans, and a playground love story – nostalgic moments that hold a timeless familiarity to suburban kids everywhere.

This nostalgic feel is cleverly juxtaposed with the confusion that comes with growing up, a confusion that serves as a gateway to the central themes of the story. Every once and a while, the reader is shown a glimpse beyond the facade of Scout’s playful childhood and into the absurd reality that is adult life. These glimpses reveal faults in humanity that children take note of at first glance only to “grow up” and accept the world’s problems with a numb apathy. Seeing the story through Scout’s eyes is wholly important to its themes because of this, making you stop and question why things are the way they are right when Scout does.

More on this later, but first, an introduction to Atticus.

Atticus

Image result for atticus

https://www.artofmanliness.com/2011/02/02/lessons-in-manliness-from-atticus-finch/

Atticus Finch is the father of Jem and Scout Finch, and a key part of the story’s main conflict. He is a criminal defense lawyer who can be boring to his kids but loving and wise nonetheless.

So what makes him so important? Atticus has a big court case coming up, and his job is to side with a black man. Keep in mind that this story takes place in a small Alabama town in the 1930’s. Because of this, practically every other chapter has the reader meeting someone new who hates Atticus for the same dumb reason, and isn’t afraid to say so in front of his kids.

The most rambunctious of these people is Scout’s cousin, Francis. During a Christmas gathering, Francis expresses his dislike of Atticus by calling him a “nigger-lover” over and over until he earns a righteous punch in the face from Scout. At first, Francis successfully frames Scout as the perpetrator, taking advantage of her current outcast negro-loving status. Later though, away from the bias of the rest of the family, Uncle Jack and Atticus find Scout to be innocent, and this is Atticus’s reaction to the whole issue:

“You know what’s going to happen as well as I do, Jack, and I hope and pray I can get Jem and Scout through it without bitterness, and most of all, without catching Maycomb’s usual disease. Why reasonable people go stark raving mad when anything involving a Negro comes up, is something I don’t pretend to understand… I just hope that Jem and Scout come to me for their answers instead of listening to the town.”  

At the end of Chapter Nine, Atticus reveals himself to be a clear-minded, nonconforming individual and a genuine, caring father at the same time. He, unlike most people his age, has retained a childlike sense of right and wrong, and hopes the same for his children. Perhaps this is why Atticus is a criminal defense lawyer: to protect the outcasts and rejects that deserve protection.

This isn’t the first sign of wisdom Atticus shows, either. Much earlier, in Chapter Three, he introduces himself as the moral compass of the story with this nugget:

You never really understand a person until you consider things from his point of view . . . until you climb into his skin and walk around in it.”

Philosopher William James explains this idea best in his essay On A Certain Blindness in Human Beings. Here’s the basic idea:

Humans naturally care most about what is right in front of them: family, friends, work, passions, etc. Everyone lives in his/her own little world, constructed out of the information displayed all around them. When someone’s world collides with another’s and threatens to disrupt his/her reality,  prejudice is born. A closed mind is a comfortable mind, so the most comfortable thing to do when introduced to new information that undermines one’s understanding of the world is to reject it.

When rejection is the path of least resistance, prejudice becomes free to grow, fueled by a mob mentality. Next thing you know, you’ve got 1930’s Alabama.

Most people in Maycomb County accept prejudice with open arms, happy to live in their ignorant little world. But not Atticus. He is stronger than to conform, because as a lawyer, he is never quick to judge.

Socratic Seminar

Image result for socrates

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socrates

Every week, my class holds an edgy student-only discussion called a Socratic Seminar about what we’ve read. Some weeks are full of insight, while others are dull. This week was the latter. The issue wasn’t with the material we were talking about; now that I’ve taken some time to reflect, I have plenty to say about To Kill a Mockingbird. I think our main problem was that we’re just really bad question-makers sometimes. Most people in the class (including yours truly) did not take advantage of the time we were given to develop solid, meaningful questions, and we ended up asking stuff like “how does it relate to killing mockingbirds” and “why is Scout a tomboy”.

Next week, I’ll make sure to go into the discussion with a few well-crafted prompts to get everyone thinking.

Conclusion

So far, I’ve loved reading To Kill a Mockingbird. It brings me back to the worry-free days of elementary school while simultaneously raising questions about the state of society. Why are we prejudiced? What can we learn about prejudice from children? And, most importantly, how can we use this knowledge to end prejudice?

“The 100” Book Review

Image result for the 100

http://www.channel4.com/programmes/the-100

The 100 is what you get when you take Lord of the Flies, throw in some young adolescence, add women, and do it all a few centuries into the future; it is essentially a sci-fi teen drama set half on a post-apocalyptic Earth, and half on a massive satellite city. Motifs include love, death, and decision, all blending together into a smooth, engaging story.

Plot

The reader begins the story following 18-year old Clarke, a prisoner convicted for unknown reasons. She is one of the 100, a group of teenage criminals granted a second chance at life in exchange for returning to a long-abandoned Earth to test its survivability. When the 100 crash their way into an undisturbed Earthen forest, reactions are mixed. Some people are dazed by the beauty, while others drown in fear.

A  select few of the 100, including Clarke, rise up above the rest to make the important decisions, forming a cast of main characters. Some of these self-determined leaders fight, while others fall in love, and still others save lives. The one thing that ties these people together is the strange new world they must all face with courage and quick-thinking, all while their Big Brother home ship looms from above.

Between chapters on Earth, the reader follows a Romeo and Juliet esque subplot revolving around a girl named Glass who escaped the drop ship before being sent to Earth in the name of love. Due to her past, the love she wants does not come easy, and the reader must struggle along with Glass as she works to heal a wounded relationship.

Structure

The 100 is written in 3rd-person, although each chapter revolves around one character and their thoughts, which would make it more suitable for a multiple first person POV structure. One interesting element of this story’s writing style is the flashback included in every chapter. These short memories did a great deal of characterization and were blended in with the rest of the plot quite smoothly.

The text itself is easy to follow, making The 100 a page-turner during its more dramatic moments.

The main issue with the writing style was the noticeably repetitive word choice that can be a bit annoying at times. Nonetheless, The 100 achieves a perfect balance of dialogue and imagery, painting a picture in the reader’s mind without being too descriptive.

Substance

At times throughout the story, The 100 can be blaringly cliche. Clarke is your run-of-the-mill Mary Sue caught in a triangle of two boys attractive in polar-opposite ways, and the subplot involving Glass and her boyfriend Luke is a predictable forbidden love story.

The teen romance is not this book’s strong point; the real substance comes from the dramatic action outside of the love tales. Throughout the story, the 100 must face various scenarios akin to those of Lord of the Flies. Many difficult decisions rise up that prompt the question: should you act for the good of the few or the good of the many? Should this girl be killed, or given a second chance? Should we save her from the fire, or save ourselves? Should I report a crime, or risk association? Questions like these urge the reader to question their own morals, and give him/her a better understanding of the difficulty in making such large decisions.

Morality seems simple from afar, but from a first-hand perspective, the lines become blurred. in life-or-death situations, it is often difficult to find a win-win scenario; sometimes compromise just isn’t possible, and that is what The 100 is out to tell its readers.

Conclusion

Although parts of the story feel a bit like a season of The Bachelorette, the lovey-dovey elements are balanced out by themes of survival and morality, making The 100 a well-rounded read for anyone looking for a gritty, heart breaking, sci-fi read.

The final verdict:

2/5

Living That Life of Purpose

Capture

My English class was recently assigned to listen to a podcast featuring host Don Wettrick and guest Joshua Medcalf. Both men are bright-minded entrepreneurs with some insightful opinions on the current education system.

Throughout the discussion, Metcalf points out three major flaws in today’s schooling:

  1. Autonomy
  2. Points and Degrees
  3. Post-School Preparation

Autonomy

Image result for straitjacket

https://www.istockphoto.com/photo/man-up-in-a-straitjacket-gm93477230-3927719?esource=SEO_GIS_CDN_Redirect

Most school environments provide students with little to no autonomy, or freedom to teach themselves. Medcalf believes that the best way to find success is by yourself. Every student has unique strengths, weaknesses, passions, and beliefs that should drive him/her to find the success within.

The education system does not encourage natural individuality, instead opting for a simple one-size-fits-all program. From a business standpoint, this is the cheapest, easiest way to pump out workers and keep a stable, growing economy. But from a worker’s standpoint, it’s not that simple. Standardization leaves many individuals to grow up depressed and uninspired, not satisfied with their livelihoods.

This loss of inspiration starts early on in life. Everyone has creativity and wonder embedded in themselves when they are born. Medcalf says that if you walk into a first grade classroom and ask who is an artist, you’ll be answered with a sea of young hands. But if you do the same in a second grade classroom, you’ll find only a small few drops of confident creativity left. Children are easily impressionable and the constant reinforcement of “be quiet” and “you’re wrong and I’m right” encourages uniformity.

The biggest problem with a lack of autonomy is its bi-products. Instead of the education system nourishing young minds and setting them up to become innovative, self-fulfilling individuals,  it is hiding humanity in a sleek, metallic case that is to become part of a larger machine. This may have worked great in the industrial revolution, but we now have the technology to make these machines much cheaper and more efficiently without expending the livelihoods of the people. It’s time that society ditches the old, rigid system and moves on to a more colorful, flexible one.


Points and Degrees

Image result for materialism

http://nagolbud.com/society/materialism-the-root-of-unhappiness/

One of the most powerful ways that the school system enforces uniformity is through points and degrees. It seems to be the only thing that anyone cares about, students and teachers alike. This is what all curriculum revolves around:

You cram for this quiz so you know what you need to ace the practice test to prepare for the big final exam, all for what? In the pursuit of knowledge and intelligence? No. For the self-fulfillment of overcoming a challenging obstacle? Of course not! It’s all for the POINTS!!!

This materialistic outlook is not unique to academics either. People are more likely to choose a higher-paying job that is less interesting to them than a lower-paying job that they are more passionate about. Hardly anyone will buy a book or watch a movie unless it was produced by a popular company. Most people will choose name brand over store brand although the products are practically the same. In today’s world, extrinsic value is much more important than it should be.

So what is the big problem with this? Two words… or one… I don’t really know: Self-fulfillment.

In the podcast, Medcalf explains that self-fulfillment comes from going out and facing adversity. There is nothing more satisfying in life than identifying a problem and working hard to find a solution. The education system discourages working hard by objectifying the problems it proposes.

For example, if the goal of a project is originally “research the inner workings of a developing country to help gain a general understanding of the socioeconomic status of most of the world”, school boils the goal down to “write a short paper on Mexico for one hundred points”. When students are told to work for an extrinsic goal such as points, they are much more likely to do the bare minimum requirement for the most credit, instead of pushing themselves as learners. I myself am evidence of that (except for this blog which I spend too much time writing).

The problem with doing the bare minimum is that once you get your points, all the information and any ounce of interest you had for the project leaves your head to be replaced with another surface-level assignment. What was the point in the first place?


Post-School Preparation?

Simply put, there is none. Both Medcalf and Wettrick touch on this issue throughout the podcast. I might not know how to write a check, but I do know that the mitochondria is the powerhouse of the cell! Education does not do a good job at sending students out into the “real world”; it should be a concern that people don’t consider school as part of the “real world” in the first place.

One of my favorite statements that Medcalf makes during the podcast is that school provides knowledge but not experience. In order to truly master a subject, you must have both. Because students just have knowledge, they go out into the “real world” with the idea that they already have what they need. This is not the case. Doing something has much more weight than knowing something.

For instance, you can know that eating right and exercising will help you lose weight, but that does not mean you will choose act upon your knowledge. It is much more complicated than “eating right” and “exercising”; you have to have experience to understand what diet and exercise plan works best for you. The one-size-fits-all education system makes people believe that one size does fit all, but this is hardly ever true. Nonetheless, school will never tell you that little tidbit.

No number of degrees will pay for student loans up front, either. Medcalf argues that college is a useful tool for some while serving as a trap for others. People will say “go to college and then follow your dreams” but how are you going to follow your dreams working twelve hours a day to give enough money back to your parents so they aren’t breathing down your neck? Needless to say, colleges will not hold your hand on the way out.

Image result for not ready for the real world

https://www.christianpost.com/news/college-graduates-not-ready-for-the-real-world-139283/

A Word On Failure

Most people, whether they admit it or not, are terrified of failure.

Why? Medcalf describes this issue as a “disease of perfectionism”; many people’s idols – movie stars, musicians, athletes, models – are depicted as flawless. People look at their heroes, and then look at themselves, and think “I could never be that perfect, so why try?”

Medcalf argues that trial and error is the only way to reach your idea of perfection. Hardly any artist composes a masterpiece on their first try. Failure is inevitable, as with failure comes experience.

People fear failing because they look at it in a negative connotation. All they’ll get out of failure is humiliation. In reality, failure is a vital part of the learning process. If you overcome an obstacle without any trouble, you did not learn or gain anything from the experience. If that was the case, everyone would be a genius just because he/she can breathe, something no simple rock or pile of dung could ever hope to do.

Because people fear failure, they will look to the small, short-term successes. in this day and age, successes like listening to a song, receiving likes on a picture, upgrading your barbarians to level five, or even watching pornography are chosen over long-term goals all the time. Next thing you know, all of your free time is spent, and what do you have to show for it?

Image result for staring at phone

https://www.additudemag.com/adult-health-7-solutions-to-sleep-problems-article-5254b-man-staring-at-phone-in-bed-ts-498175136-jpg/

I believe that failure should be incorporated into the school system. If classes provided us students with the freedom to fail, I would consider it a gift. With failure comes wisdom, appreciation, and growth. If provided with free time in school, I would take advantage of it to improve my writing and drawing because a more artsy job sounds way better than years in a cubicle.

Over the course of the podcast, Medcalf establishes two basic ways to live: you can either skim through life or dive deep.


My Opinion

Although I’ve praised Medcalf’s ideas for about a thousand words now, they are a bit frightening. Many of the problems identified do not have a satisfying solution yet:

What will replace standardized tests? How would companies hire without degrees? What if many students refused to take advantage of the new system? How can schools better prepare students for the road ahead? How much should schools provide and how much should be left to the students to work out themselves? Needless to say, it is still going to take a great amount of hard work and ingenuity to find answers.

Another important piece of the puzzle is voice. In order to create such a movement to do school different, you need as many people as you can backing you up. Many people might believe in your cause, but are not willing to help spread it because they do not wish to sacrifice their well-being. Medcalf brings this up in his discussion with Wettrick. He is frustrated that Gandhi and M.L.K. risked their lives for their cause and some of his coworkers refuse to give up their job.

Image result for gandhi starving

http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/gandhi-begins-fast-in-protest-of-caste-separation

It is hard to persuade the masses to go off the beaten path. It is so much easier to just distract yourself from your problems. Hell, before I started writing this post, I played two games of Bloons Tower Defense 5.

Aside from these issues, Medcalf’s ideas are inspirational. With enough passionate minds willing to do whatever it takes, anything is possible. If the Do School Different movement is a success and the tyrannical SAT is overthrown by something new, it could change the world in a great way.

Imagine a world where nobody sulks through their workdays, instead living out their wildest dreams,

A world where people are willing to take risks, accepting failure as part of their journey,

Where everyone parties through life, embracing each issue as a new opportunity…

…Okay now I am just describing a utopia. But you get the point. Of course, education reform would not rewire everyone’s outlook of the world, but it would lead us in the right direction.


Conclusion

I appreciated this podcast. Josh and Don reminded me to turn off Safe Street and ride through Risky Road instead. It is much more satisfying to live life on hard mode than to blend in with everyone who simply goes with the flow. Who care’s what people think? Just go out and have fun doing whatever you do! Take what you truly love and explore it. Delve deeper. Don’t stop until you’re satisfied (that’s why this blog is almost three times the assigned length). LIVE!

Okay I think I’m done now. Thanks for reading until the end. Bye.

– Third-Eyed Robot

 

We Are the Ocean, and the Ocean is Us

This is it. My journey with Haroun has come to a close. To wrap up all the goofy characters, motifs and references in a big, shiny bow, my allusion group was prompted to make a project.


Brainstorm!

brain

http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/expanding-brain

The goal of said project was to portray our point of view when reading the story – allusions – to the rest of the class. When my group gathered together, we began the creative process like anyone else: by taking up space and breathing air. There were no light bulbs on day one, but that is quite all right; sometimes it is healthy to let a problem simmer on the back burner of the brain.

At first, thinking of a clever medium to explain the many convoluted references in “Haroun and the Sea of Stories” seemed a daunting task. But after a weekend break, our brains cooked up a perfect idea. On day two of the project, my group realized that instead of trying to simplify Rushdie’s sea of allusions, we could embrace it.

We finally agreed on a design with strings, pins and pictures. Imagine one of those murder mystery bulletin boards shown in detective movies, but plastered onto the wall of a high school classroom instead of a police office. The idea worked well; it looks complicated from a distance, but when observed closely, one begins to understand the many simple connections that make up the big picture.


The Process

Work was steady and the project was finished after a few class periods.  First, we delved deeper into our lens, scavenging the book (and mainly the internet) for stories intertwined with HATSOS. I was surprised by some of our finds. One interesting nugget we discovered was the link between Mudra and Batman. Both are a Dark Knight of sorts, both fight for justice in a dark city, and both are considerably poor verbal communicators. You wouldn’t have caught that one in the first read-through, eh?

After finding a surplus of allusions, we got to work on the bulletin board. We danced through this part of the project; one member of the group would be sending images to the library printer, while another member would be dashing to retrieve them, while another would be cutting out pictures, while another would be pinning them up, and another would be jotting down explanations in Sharpie. This was when we really got into the flow of things.

The final product was just what I expected. Going off of my teacher’s rubric, I would give our group a solid 85%.

The system of strings and pins provided the message of complexity that we were going for; most people see allusions as simple references or shout-outs, but our project showed that they all join together to form a complex web that serves as the very foundation of any story. To be fair, the web ended up a bit shoddy due to our time constraints, which loses us a few points. So in conclusion, our final project was no work of art, but it reflected our outlook of the story well and provided the viewers with our unique insight.

Image result for stock image classroom

http://battleofthebits.org/disk/battle/00001947/OHC01762%20.txt

The projects of the other groups were on a similar level. Both the satire and allegory groups produced some basic Prezis that were not original but provided clear definitions and helpful examples, like Will Ferrell’s satirical impression of George Bush. The mono myth group on the other hand was a bit more creative, using a board game as an analogy to take us through the many stages of the Hero’s Journey.

All in all, our class did well putting everything together. A for effort!


What is the Point of Telling Stories That Aren’t Even True?

This question has festered in my head since day one, and I think I finally have an answer. From the angle of allusions, fictional stories provide a world of escape.

Millions of stories have been communicated through hundreds of mediums, from paintings to video games. Most allusions are not simply plopped on top of a finished story; they are deeply embedded into every page, powered by our subconscious story-telling instincts. No story is completely original. To make one new story requires a web of old stories that build upon one another until they blend into a great sea.

Every story flows through this ocean, an ocean that has become so vast and deep that it has become a world in itself. This world revolves around ours. Its waves crash upon our shores and soak into our soil. This world is bound together by the strong force that is allusion. Allusions control the ebb and flow of every story – the calm, the rough, the wind and the storms.

rainbow_ocean__by_thelma1

https://thelma1.deviantart.com/art/Rainbow-Ocean-24693999

Allusions bind all stories into one magical place that you and I can visit just as much as Haroun. The world serves as an escape from reality that can feel just as real sometimes. It drives our motivations and fuels our imaginations. This world is what makes us human.

So what is the point of stories that aren’t even true? That’s what.

– Third-Eyed Robot

 

 

The “Happy” Ending

“Haroun and the Sea of Stories” does a great job at providing a satisfying end to the plot while leaving the reader with plenty to ponder. The climactic battle of the Chups and Gups signifies an end to the war, but not to Haroun’s questions. Even after his visit to the P2C2E House and a meeting with the Walrus himself, things seem to become even more complicated than they began:

How did the Eggheads control the moon? What really happened to the P2C2E generator? Can the Walrus really manufacture happy endings? How are Kahani the moon and Kahani the city linked? In the midst of all these questions swirling through Haroun’s mind, the rest of the characters seem happy to accept the ending that they are given. This mindset shows that Haroun is a consistently-inquisitive character and suggests that there is no such thing as a true happy ending as well.


Butt?

Another mystery left unsolved is that of Butt the Hoopoe. Throughout the story, it is made clear that Butt is not a bird but a machine. I did not think much of this strange detail until reading one of Butt’s last lines, a reaction to his being ignored by Haroun:

“No point even asking me, which you didn’t,” … “I’m only a machine.”

(Rushdie, ch. 12 par. 13)

img017.jpg

https://helenblackburnart.wordpress.com/tag/butt-the-hoopoe/

Maybe this is nothing more than a little gaff, but it struck me as odd. Is Butt just making the first excuse he can think of to keep Haroun from requesting his help, or is there something more behind that statement?

I got a feeling that there is some sarcasm in the bird’s remark. Throughout the story, on both Earth and Kahani, Butt serves but one purpose: to be a self-proclaimed “Super Express” driver. (Rushdie, ch. 2, par. 15) His sole job is to transport and everyone treats him as such. Though this may be true, Butt makes a point of reminding people that robots have rights too:

“You maybe have some objection to machines?” … “But but but you have entrusted your life to me. Then I am not worthy of a little of your respect? Machines also have their sense of self-esteem…”

(Rushdie, ch. 4, par. 16)

Remarks like this suggest one of two things: either Hoopoe is just being sensitive, or he along with the rest of the robots are mistreated, perhaps even oppressed. The latter is much more fun to discuss.

The only type of robot that the reader meets on Kahani is the flying machine. As far as is known, all the other robo-birds and whatnot go about their business without any signs of resistance. All of them, of course, except for Butt. Butt’s occasional commentary on machine rights may be a weak attempt at proving his worth; the Hoopoe might be a simple robot, but he was modeled after a human. The machine even shows that he is aware of this:

 “No need to gawp like that, young sir, I can’t help it if I remind you of someone; at least, being a good driver, he’s a fellow who feels fond of a good, fast travel machine.”

(Rushdie, ch. 4, par. 15)

This linkage merges the line between man and machine. Now, I’m not going to get into the whole thing about robots becoming human; I want to talk about the opposite. Butt the mail coach, just like the Hoopoe, is treated as a machine and nothing more. The only character that seems to notice both Butts’ human features is Haroun himself; all the Guppees and bus riders see the Butts as a mode of transport. This could be reflective of the millions of job positions around the world where people are treated like machines, their cubicles draining the life out of them and exchanging it for green paper.

Is this interpretation at all what Salman Rushdie intended? Probably not. But but but it is still quite fun to think about.


Anti-Climactic Final Discussion

Our second Socratic Seminar was great, but I feel that my group’s final discussion did not reach that same standard. Instead of building on one or two topics, nobody seemed to have much to say, resulting in bouncing around an array of weak ideas. One of the center points of discussion ended up being “Toy Story” references, which isn’t a bad thing in some cases but did not have much to do with anything in that situation. On the bright side, I got some insight into other people’s ideas of the history of the Chupwallas, a subject shrouded in mystery by the book.


A Word on Speech

If knowledge is power, then speech is strength. Communication is a vehicle used to spread knowledge to others. This makes its existence vital to the growth of human society, for what use is knowledge when chained down to one frail memory? When knowledge is not spread and instead hidden, it is left to rot, locked in the darkest corner of the mind. What kind of power is that? This is one of the main themes that Salman Rushdie wished to bring to the reader through HATSOS.

grooms-speech

http://www.groompower.com/grooms-speech/

Rushdie does not just prove the strength of speech but the disadvantage one has without it. This is done very clearly through the symbolism of the Chupwallas. The Chups are a race of people who have had their power of speech taken from them by an evil leader and have been wrongly associated with that leader. This leader, Khattam Shud, does not hate communication as his adversaries make it out to be; he just sees the limitation of it as an opportunity to seize power; if there is nobody to speak out against him, he can do as he pleases.

The Chupwallas mirror some of Rushdie’s real life experiences. His Khattam Shud is the man who put a fatwa on his head, Ayatollah Khomeini. His Chups are the good people of Iran who have been silenced by their leader.


The Final Question

Before reading HATSOS, my class asked a question: “Are fictional stories morally-good lies?” My final answer is: “Well, sometimes”.

It is easy to prove that fictional stories are lies. The point of any story is to entertain in some way. For a fictional story to be truly entertaining, it must be captivating enough to suspend the reader/viewer/listener’s disbelief.  If a lie is a statement intended to deceive, then the purpose of a fictional story is to entertain through lies.

To prove that a fictional story is morally-good is a bit more difficult. The general definition of morally-good is that which is beneficial to the world’s well-being. If a fictional story is intended to teach a message that serves as a benefit to society, it is a morally-good lie. On the other hand, a fictional story can be used to harm, such as in propaganda or slander. HATSOS touches on this in the very beginning of the book:

“Anybody can tell stories,” … “Liars, and cheats, and crooks, for example. But for the stories with that Extra Ingredient, ah, for those, even the best storytellers need the Story Waters.”

In this analogy, a (morally) good story requires a meaningful lesson from the Sea of Stories.


Conclusion

“Haroun and the Sea of Stories” throws the reader head-first into a wacky world full of colorful characters and deep, meaningful mystery. The goofy children’s book style serves the motifs perfectly, hinting at darker themes through a playful lens. Although parts of the story will appear confusing and abstract to some readers, this is rarely an issue with an open, imaginative mindset going in.

I will look back on this story with a fondness for its masterful mix of fairy tale and philosophy. It is a fun read I hope to come back to some day.

3.5/5

a4haroun_1000

https://geekroll.wordpress.com/tag/haroun-and-the-sea-of-stories-question-answers/

 

 

 

 

The Adventure Continues!

I recently finished reading through Chapters Five to Eight of “Haroun and the Sea of Stories”, and my opinion of the book has stayed the same. The plot does not fail to satisfy, introducing a new theme or face each time a fresh chapter unfolds. The same can be said for the unique charm of the story’s world, which took off from the grounds of reality in the beginning and now soars high above, floating through clouds of imagination.

While the early chapters focus on story-telling, the middle chapters of “Haroun and the Sea of Stories” rely more on the themes of language boundaries and the division that comes with it. This theme is most apparent in Chapter Eight, “Shadow Warriors”, where the character Mudra struggles to introduce himself:

‘Gogogol,’ … ‘Kafkafka,’

In great bewilderment, Prince Bolo retorts with:

‘Eh? What’s that? What’s the fellow saying?’ … ‘I can’t make out a single word.’

Another character, Blabbermouth, has an interesting commentary on Bolo’s remarks:

‘What a poser, I swear,’ … ‘Our Bolo. Talking so big and rude because he thinks it’ll stop us from noticing the he’s scared out of his pants.’

This is quite an intriguing observation. In the previous chapter, the Shadow Warrior is described physically in great detail, with many of his Chup-like characteristics contrasting with their Gup counterparts. While the Guppees are light, the Chupwalas are dark, and etc…

Untitled-1

resource

These cultural differences paired with Mudra’s poor verbal communication erects a wall between him and Prince Bolo. Bolo fears the Chupwalas simply because they are foreign and unbeknownst to him, which poses a threat. Such a simple barrier of communication is what drives humans into war and other conflicts, and Blabbermouth recognizes this wall in an instant.

Luckily, most of the Guppee gang is more open-minded than Bolo and willing to give Mudra a chance. It is soon discovered that he speaks fluently in a sort of sign language that Rashid is familiar with. After some translations, useful intel is recieved:

‘Mudra is a friend. Also… we have none other than the Champion Warrior of Chup, considered by most Chupwalas to be second ion authority only to Cultmaster Khattam-Shud himself.’ … ‘Mudra is no longer an ally of the Cultmaster’s. He has become disgusted with the growing cruelty and fanaticism of the Cult of the tongueless ice-idol Bezaban, and has broken off relations with Khattam-Shud…’

The team now has the enemy’s second-hand man allied with them, all because of a little sign language and the benefit of the doubt. Not so scary now, eh Bolo? Of course, Mudra could be lying, but that is a topic for another day.

Salmon Rushdie has woven many threads of other tales into “Haroun and the Sea of Stories” in the form of allusion. Rushdie incorporates allusions to borrow motifs, pay tribute, and leave clues of his inspirations. This pdf has a great list that covers most of the story’s main allusions, and some of these can be observed within Chapters Five to Eight.

One of the most apparent references found in the middle of the book alludes to “Alice in Wonderland”. The army of the Guppees is composed of Pages that make up Chapters and Volumes, a military structure very reminiscent of the army of Cards that make up the Decks. The Guppee queen also mirrors the Queen of Cards, both sharing a few… defining features.

DisneyQueenHeartsresource

One of the driving questions behind this book is an inquiry of its own purpose:

What’s the point in telling stories that aren’t even true?’

Rushdie plants this question in the reader’s mind during Chapter One, which gives it plenty of time to grow and fester in the back of the brain. After some pondering, I have found a relatively straightforward answer to this question. Fictional stories teach lessons and provide humans with something that most could not stay happy and sane without: entertainment.

“Haroun and the Sea of Stories” expands on this answer throughout the story in a few ways. First and most obviously, Rushdie takes something that is seemingly-not true to Haroun – one of his father’s stories – and makes it real, sending Haroun to the world itself. This concept relates to the law of attraction, which states that thought and desire ultimately design our reality.

Salman Rushdie also uses numerous metaphors to support the themes he explains to the reader. Such metaphors include:

  • The Story Waters serving as a source of spirit, showing Rashid depressed without them
  • The sad condition of the Chupwalas, who have no tongue to tell their stories in
  • The happy-go-lucky Guppees, who live virtually care-free because of their constant chattering

uq6gsr0wt9yu7awl_origresource

This Wednesday, my English class had another discussion concerning the deeper meanings of the book. My discussion group delved into a particularly insightful debate about the relationship between storytelling and juggling. In Chapter , Haroun talks to Blabbermouth about this idea:

‘I always though storytelling was like juggling,’ … ‘You keep a lot of different tales in the air, and juggle them up and down, and if you’re good you don’t drop any. So maybe juggling is a kind of storytelling, too.’

When this topic was first brought up, the group shut it down, thinking that everything was already explained in the passage. After another moment of consideration, many of us exploded with ideas. We made many connections between juggling and stories:

  • Both take great skill and concentration
  • No one part can be left out without ruining the rest
  • The complexity and intensity of each act gradually increases
  • The acts are always similar each time, but just different enough to captivate the audience
  • Different types appeal to different audiences

Once the discussion was over, it became harder to point out differences between storytelling and juggling. That is the sign of a quality discussion.

In conclusion: good read, great metaphors, amazing discussion.